
documenting
the |
Print on Demand |
|
PRINT
ON DEMAND POD has a number of applications. University presses use it when they can't justify the expense of producing and warehousing a sizeable print run—for instance, to keep backlist books available. Smaller publishers use it as a more economical business model, showing lower startup costs but at the expense of a smaller per-book profit (due to economies of scale, digitally printed books have a higher unit production cost than books produced in large runs on offset presses). A friend of mine is doing his own book for a class he teaches at a community college. Carl Becker, an early 20th century historian, wrote a very influential essay entitled (as I recall) "Every Man His Own Historian," arguing that each era has to reinterpret the events of the past in light of their current attitudes and values. I think I read it as a freshman at the University of Minnesota, and it had a lasting impact, tho' I haven't reread it in decades. I know I still have a copy, and this mention of it may cause me to dig it out and look at it again. That's one of the happy by-products of writing—you go back to stuff that is vaguely in memory because you need to be more precise than you do when chatting over cocktails. The point is that every man, or woman, can now be his own publisher. That's potentially very significant, but not necessarily a good thing, of course—there are already too many bad books chasing too few readers; but you know what I mean. Books that once would not be published, even by a university press, now may have a life beyond a scholar's xeroxed typescript circulated among a few friends. What blogs are doing for those with a need to share opinions, observations and the (too) intimate details of their daily life, POD has the capability of doing for the scholar, the teacher and those who write (or photograph or paint, etc.) for a miniscule audience. It can also enable the poet and the novelist to get their work published, even if those books never make it into the traditional book distribution system. In fact, most print on demand books sell fewer than 200 copies, and most of those go to the author and his/her friends. POD thus is often one form of vanity publishing, but it can also be a way of keeping old titles in print when demand would never justify a reprinting. Traditional printing technology, such as letterpress and offset printing, is simply not economical for short print runs. Wikipedia tells us that "Many traditional small presses have replaced their traditional printing equipment with POD equipment or contract their printing out to POD service providers. Many academic publishers, including university presses, use POD services to maintain a large backlist." So POD is really a digital short print-run technology, but the implications of that are significant. What it means
for you
The quality of the POD books, on the other hand, is likely to be a bit uneven, but usually pretty good. From all the evidence I've seen, POD printers do a fine job—good paper, quality printing, very nice covers, although I am usually disappointed about the reproduction of my black-and-white photographs—just fine for a reference work, but not so good when you are a photographer hoping to retain some detail in the shadows and texture in the highlights.
|